01
Contributor-approved scope
Name the articles or sections, the contributor's role and whether they researched, drafted, edited or implemented the page. Record consent for public attribution.
Correction record · source-led writing
An earlier version named a contributor and attributed four civic-information pages, word counts, indexing speed, ranking and traffic to that person. The Built In Ireland evidence file did not contain the records needed to support those statements. The personal, output and performance claims have been removed.
A live article shows that content exists. It does not, by itself, prove who researched or wrote it, who revised it, when it entered production or which person should receive credit for later search performance.
For civic-information content, a trustworthy record also needs the exact official sources and checked dates. Indexing speed and ranking are time-bound analytics facts, not qualities that can be safely attributed to one writer without a dated report and careful analysis.
No contributor consent, accepted briefs, source packs, review trail, release mapping or analytics snapshot supporting the former narrative was logged here. This page is therefore a correction record, not a recommendation.
The evidence pack should make both authorship and factual discipline visible.
Name the articles or sections, the contributor's role and whether they researched, drafted, edited or implemented the page. Record consent for public attribution.
Preserve the source URLs and checked dates used for each time-sensitive process. A polished explainer is not evidence that its details were current.
Keep the submitted draft and accepted revision or review history. Shared authorship and substantive editing should be acknowledged rather than compressed into one name.
Connect the accepted work to the released URLs and date. Do not claim live or indexed status from a local file or scheduled publication.
If search performance is relevant, attach the dated query and page report. State that rankings move and avoid treating a short observation window as a guaranteed outcome.
Do not use it as an employment reference, writing credential, client testimonial, course certificate or evidence of a person's authorship, rankings or traffic. It is a visible correction to unsupported copy.
A future evidence-backed record may be possible, but it would require a new factual review and contributor consent. It would not inherit the names, dates, totals or outcomes removed from this draft.