01
Brief and accepted scope
Record the publication, target pages or components, source requirements and definition of done. If the work changed during review, preserve the final accepted scope.
Correction record · editorial and build work
An earlier version named a contributor and described dates, deliverables, metrics, mentorship and a recommendation. The site's evidence file did not support those claims. They have been removed. The URL remains online only so an old link resolves to the correction instead of preserving or silently deleting the unsupported story.
The local site contained a fully written reference-style page and a register entry. That proves a page was drafted. It does not prove that a contributor existed, consented to publication, completed work, worked during the dates once shown, received mentorship or caused any stated publishing or traffic result.
No matching contributor consent, accepted brief, review record, commit attribution, release receipt, analytics snapshot or signed reference was recorded in the source trail used by this site. The page therefore cannot be presented as a personal endorsement.
This correction makes no adverse claim about a real person. It records only the state of Built In Ireland's own evidence.
Editorial and build work can be documented precisely without claiming more than the evidence shows.
Record the publication, target pages or components, source requirements and definition of done. If the work changed during review, preserve the final accepted scope.
Keep contributor-approved attribution plus drafts, commits or review submissions that connect the person to the bounded work. A filename alone is not reliable authorship evidence.
Name who checked sourcing, accuracy, originality and publication readiness. Separate editorial review from technical deployment checks.
If the record says “published” or “shipped”, match the accepted files to a dated release or public version. Local changes and proposed copy must stay labelled local.
Traffic and ranking figures need a dated analytics report and a cautious attribution note. Do not convert correlation into a personal performance claim.
Do not cite it as an employment reference, client testimonial, cohort certificate, portfolio verification or proof that any named person is available for work. It is a transparent correction record.
If complete evidence and consent are supplied later, a fresh review can decide whether a new individual record is supportable. The future page would identify its sources, publication state and revision date. It would not simply restore the old claims.